Simplifying Policy Management
With Policy Pulse, you can:
- Stay up to date or catch-up: Weekly Digests summarize a week's content
- Save your time: Quickly find documents and bill versions.
- See the entire policy picture: View an Interactive Timeline of Bills and Proceedings
- Save your focus: Skim AI-generated summaries and choose what's worth digging into.
Weekly Digest
Application of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U39E) for Review of the Disadvantaged Communities – Green Tariff, Community Solar Green Tariff and Green Tariff Shared Renewables Programs.
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Bill to cut California's industrial emissions, shift to zero-emission tech, and prioritize disadvantaged communities by 2045
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Streamline approval process for upgrading transmission facilities by allowing advanced reconductoring projects without construction permits, reducing costs and improving efficiency
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Application of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U39E) for Review of the Disadvantaged Communities – Green Tariff, Community Solar Green Tariff and Green Tariff Shared Renewables Programs.
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Bill to cut California's industrial emissions, shift to zero-emission tech, and prioritize disadvantaged communities by 2045
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Streamline approval process for upgrading transmission facilities by allowing advanced reconductoring projects without construction permits, reducing costs and improving efficiency
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Oversight of Electric Integrated Resource Planning and Procurement Processes.
Last Week's New Comments +3
Update on Recent Filings in CPUC Proceeding R25-06-019
Recent filings in CPUC proceeding R25-06-019 reflect parties’ responses to the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) August 4, 2025 ruling on finalizing load forecasts and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions benchmarks for Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) filings. The ALJ ruling, and a subsequent August 18, 2025 email ruling, set requirements and deadlines for load-serving entities (LSEs) to submit updated energy and peak...
demand forecasts, with a new deadline of September 12, 2025. The following is a sampling of parties’ positions on key topics addressed in the latest comments.
Load Forecasting and Reporting Requirements
- 3CE supports the ALJ’s process for using disaggregated load forecasts from the California Energy Commission’s 2024 Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR) and intends to submit updated energy and peak demand forecasts, including demand modifier information for 2025-2045, in accordance with the ruling.
- AVCE submitted an updated energy and peak demand forecast for 2025-2045, providing a detailed explanation of its methodology, which incorporates historical usage, customer counts, and weather data, as well as a 0.77% annual load growth rate consistent with the SCE area.
- PG&E does not intend to update its energy forecast, peak demand forecast, or demand modifier in the 2024 CEC IEPR, as stated in its September 12, 2025 filing.
Forecasting Methodologies
- AVCE’s methodology is based on customer classifications, historical usage, and weather data from the SoCal Logistics Airport-Victorville, using linear regression models and a five-year weather data window to account for climate change impacts. AVCE applies a 0.77% annual load growth rate for both short- and long-term projections and calibrates forecasts against actual usage, adjusting if errors exceed 5%.
Confidentiality and Public Filing Requirements
- 3CE plans to file its updated load forecast under seal, as permitted by the ALJ ruling, and will include public energy forecast information for 2025-2045 in its public filing, in line with requirements for Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs).
Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Electric Integrated Resource Planning and Related Procurement Processes.
Last Week's New Comments +7
CPUC R20-05-003: Summary of Recent Party Comments on Proposed Decision (PD) for SCE Petition
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is considering a Proposed Decision (PD) that would modify Southern California Edison Company’s (SCE) petition related to Mid-Term Reliability (MTR) procurement and compliance mechanisms. This update provides a sampling of positions from utilities, trade groups, and advocacy organizations on key topics addressed in reply...
comments filed on September 8, 2025.
Elimination of Bridging/Bridge Contracts as a Compliance Mechanism
- WPTF expresses concern that eliminating bridging as a compliance mechanism for load-serving entities (LSEs) facing procurement delays could increase uncertainty and costs, and recommends retaining exemptions for LSEs with delayed resources.
- AReM opposes the removal of bridging, arguing that it could create uncertainty for existing bridge contracts and complicate compliance with IRP procurement orders. AReM prefers maintaining the option for short-term bridge contracts while allowing demonstration of resource adequacy (RA) compliance as an alternative.
- SDG&E recommends retaining the bridge procurement option for LSEs that do not meet month-ahead system RA requirements, emphasizing its importance for managing unavoidable delays.
- SCE argues that the PD’s removal of the MTR bridge option could lead to increased costs for customers and supports modifications to allow alternative compliance mechanisms for LSEs facing delays.
- Cal Advocates supports SCE’s proposed modifications to prevent penalties for LSEs experiencing delays if they have executed contracts and met RA requirements, rather than requiring bridge contracts.
Alternative Compliance Pathways and Flexibility
- PG&E supports modifications to the PD to provide a clearly defined alternative compliance pathway for LSEs facing procurement delays, including long-term contracts and adherence to RA requirements.
- CalCCA recommends the Commission clearly identify compliance options for delayed or terminated contracts, and allow LSEs to demonstrate compliance through RA obligations for all months, not just non-Q3 months.
- SCE supports extending its proposed alternative compliance mechanism to all months and to cases of contract terminations, not just unforeseen delays.
- SDG&E urges the establishment of an RA-based compliance mechanism that exempts LSEs from penalties for MTR deficiencies if they meet their month-ahead RA requirements.
- Cal Advocates endorses replacing bridge procurement with a more flexible compliance mechanism, allowing LSEs to remain compliant if they meet RA requirements during delays.
Long-Term Contract Requirements and Cost Impacts
- SDG&E cautions against a de facto requirement for long-term contracts to cover short-term delays, warning this would increase costs and create impractical compliance scenarios.
- Cal Advocates raises concerns that the PD’s long-term contract requirement for delays in long lead-time (LLT) resources could result in unnecessary costs and over-procurement.
- PG&E argues against changes to LLT compliance requirements that could lead to unnecessary costs due to over-procurement, and supports exploring additional compliance paths for LLT procurement.
- CalCCA highlights that ambiguity in compliance mechanisms could lead to additional costs for ratepayers and recommends more options to ensure affordability.
Diablo Canyon Replacement and Special Procurement Categories
- SDG&E requests clarification that the PD does not alter the bridge procurement option related to Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) replacement obligations.
- PG&E suggests extending SCE’s alternative compliance pathway to the DCPP replacement category for consistency across procurement categories.
- CalCCA recommends the Commission clearly identify compliance options for DCPP replacement requirements, as well as for generic and LLT resources.
Criteria for Good Faith Efforts and Waivers
- WPTF requests guidance on the criteria for assessing "good faith efforts" by LSEs in meeting MTR requirements and recommends limiting the new compliance mechanism to three years post-deadline for the MTR tranche.
- CalCCA recommends granting waivers based on good faith efforts as defined in the new IRP proceeding, particularly for LSEs facing delays or contract terminations due to market conditions.
- Cal Advocates supports CalCCA’s recommendation to not penalize LSEs for delays in contracted resources, provided they are making good faith efforts to replace terminated contracts.
Immediate Clarity and Implementation
- AReM advises against delaying clarification for LSEs regarding compliance efforts, recommending the Commission provide immediate clarity on how RA compliance will factor into potential penalties for IRP procurement non-compliance.
Market Conditions and Procurement Challenges
- CalCCA highlights challenging market conditions, such as interconnection delays and supply chain issues, which may lead to contract delays or terminations and necessitate more flexible compliance options.
Revise Independent System Operator Governance and Establish Regional Energy Market Oversight Council for Enhanced Energy Market Participation
- Joint Rule 61, subsection (a), paragraph (13) suspended.
Establish Lithium-Ion Car Battery Safety Advisory Group for Emergency Response and Management Standards by 2028
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
Designate Solar Photovoltaic Modules as Universal Waste for Enhanced Recycling and Management Standards.
- Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator McNerney.
Mandate Volumetric Climate Credits for Residential Customers During Summer Months Under California Global Warming Solutions Act
- Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Allen.
Enhance Transparency and Accountability in Utility Rate Cases by Requiring Detailed Financial Reporting from Electrical and Gas Corporations
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
Establish Senior Counselor for Clean Energy and Equitable Supply Chains in California's Energy Policy Framework
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
- Read for the third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
Prohibit Utilities from Using Ratepayer Funds to Oppose Municipalization and Enhance Oversight by Public Advocate’s Office
- Read for the third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
- Assembly amendments concurred in, ayes 29, noes 9; ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
Enhance Public Utility Rate Transparency and Public Participation in Rate Increases for Electrical Corporations and Renewable Energy Compliance.
- Read a second time. Ordered to a third reading.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 37, Noes 0). Ordered to the Assembly.
- Joint Rules 61(a)(14) and 51(a)(4) are suspended.
- Senate amendments have been agreed to. The bill is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
Extend Active Solar Energy System Tax Exclusion and Modify Repeal Date in California Property Tax Law.
- Read for the third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
- Assembly amendments concurred in, ayes 40, noes 0; ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Enhance Load Shifting Analysis and Reporting for Cost-Effective Energy Management by the Energy Commission.
- Read for the third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
- Assembly amendments concurred in, ayes 29, noes 8; ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Mandate Virtual Power Plant Deployment and Annual Load Shift Reporting by Electrical Corporations to the Energy Commission
- Read a second time. Ordered to a third reading.
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 39, Noes 1). Ordered to the Assembly.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Senate amendments have been agreed to. The bill is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
- Senate amendments concurred in, 78-0; to Engrossing and Enrolling.
Mandate Local Electrification Plans for Zero-Emission Infrastructure and Equitable Investments in Disadvantaged Communities by 2030.
- Read a second time. Ordered to a third reading.
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 29, Noes 10). Ordered to the Assembly.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Senate amendments have been agreed to. The bill is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
- Senate amendments concurred in, ayes 65, noes 10; to Engrossing and Enrolling.
Expand Utility Data Delivery Options for Energy Usage Reporting in Covered Buildings
- Read for the third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
- Re-referred to Committee on Rules pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
- Referred from committee to the Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d), passed (Ayes 5, Noes 0), re-referred to the Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications.
- The committee on Assembly Amendments concurred in the amendments, with 12 ayes and 0 noes.
- Assembly amendments concurred in, ayes 32, noes 0; ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Revise California Williamson Act for Enhanced Solar-Use Easements and Agricultural Land Conservation
- Read a third time and amended. Ordered to a second reading.
- Joint Rule 61(a)(13) suspended, passed (Ayes 27, Noes 8).
- Read a second time. Ordered to a third reading.
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 25, Noes 8). Ordered to the Assembly.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Assembly Rule 63 is suspended.
- Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Wicks.
Extend Sales Tax Exclusions for Alternative Energy Projects and Include Nuclear Fusion Facilities Until January 1, 2028.
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
- Read for the third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
- Assembly amendments concurred in, ayes 40, noes 0; ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Enhance Fire Safety Regulations for Energy Storage Systems and Streamline Certification Processes with Local Jurisdictions.
- Read for the third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
- Assembly amendments concurred in, ayes 39, noes 0; ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Prohibit Ratepayer Funding for Political Activities by Utilities and Mandate Transparency in Public Messaging and Reporting
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 28, Noes 10). Ordered to the Assembly.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Senate amendments have been agreed to. The bill is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
- Senate amendments concurred in, 50-8; to Engrossing and Enrolling.
Establish Load Modification Protocols for Electrical Demand Forecasts by Load-Serving Entities and Resource Aggregators.
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 38, Noes 0). Ordered to the Assembly.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Senate amendments have been agreed to. The bill is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
- Senate amendments concurred in, 78-0, to Engrossing and Enrolling.
Streamline Renewable Energy Projects and Wage Compliance for Net Energy Metering Contracts in California
- Read a second time. Ordered to a third reading.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 39, Noes 0). Ordered to the Assembly.
- Senate amendments concurred in, ayes 79, noes 0; to Engrossing and Enrolling.
- Senate amendments have been agreed to. The bill is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction and Market-Based Compliance Mechanism Enhancement Act of 2023
- Joint Rules 61 and 62(a) suspended, passed (Ayes 30, Noes 8).
- Read a third time and amended. Ordered to a second reading.
- Re-referred to Committee on Rules pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(C).
- Re-referred to Committee on Environmental Quality.
- September 11, Do Pass, (Ayes 5, Noes 1).
- Read a second time. Ordered to a third reading.
- Senate Rule 29 is suspended.
- Joint Rule 10.5 suspended, passed (Ayes 29, Noes 8).
- Read third time; urgency clause adopted; passed (Ayes 29, Noes 6); ordered to the Assembly.
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Assembly Rule 63 is suspended.
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
- Joint Rules 61(a)(14) and 51(a)(4) are suspended.
- An urgency clause has been adopted. Senate amendments have been concurred in. The measure is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
Accelerate California's Clean Energy Infrastructure and Economic Development through Enhanced Financing and Regulatory Reforms
- Joint Rule 61, subsection (a), paragraph (13) suspended.
- Joint Rule 62(a) is suspended.
- Read a third time and amended.
- Ordered to the third reading.
- Re-referred to Committee on Utilities and Energy pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
- (Corrected September 10).
- Joint Rule 61 and 62(a) suspended, passed (Ayes 30, Noes 9).
- Assembly Rule 63 is suspended.
- September 12, Do Pass, (Ayes 16, Noes 0)
- Assembly amendments concurred in, ayes 30, noes 2; ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
- Joint Rule 61(a)(14) and Joint Rule 51(a)(4) suspended.
- In the Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments is pending.
- Read for the third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
Revise Independent System Operator Governance and Energy Market Regulations for Enhanced Efficiency and Compliance in California
- Joint Rules 61 and 62(a) suspended, passed (Ayes 30, Noes 8).
- Read a third time and amended. Ordered to a second reading.
- Re-referred to Committee on Rules pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(C).
- Re-referred to Committee on Elections, Utilities, and Communications.
- September 11, Do pass, (Ayes 12, Noes 0).
- Read a second time. Ordered to a third reading.
- Senate Rule 29 is suspended.
- Joint Rule 10.5 suspended, passed (Ayes 29, Noes 8).
- In the Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments is pending.
- Assembly Rule 63 is suspended.
- Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
- Joint Rules section 61, subsection (a), paragraph (14) and section 51, subsection (a), paragraph (4) suspended.
- Read third time and passed (Ayes 34, Noes 0). Ordered to the Assembly.
- Senate amendments have been agreed to. The bill is sent to Engrossing and Enrolling.
No Activity
Take the first step to simplify Policy tracking
Ready to dive in?

