Simplifying Policy Management
With Policy Pulse, you can:
- Stay up to date or catch-up: Weekly Digests summarize a week's content
- Save your time: Quickly find documents and bill versions.
- See the entire policy picture: View an Interactive Timeline of Bills and Proceedings
- Save your focus: Skim AI-generated summaries and choose what's worth digging into.
Weekly Digest
Application of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U39E) for Review of the Disadvantaged Communities – Green Tariff, Community Solar Green Tariff and Green Tariff Shared Renewables Programs.
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Bill to cut California's industrial emissions, shift to zero-emission tech, and prioritize disadvantaged communities by 2045
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Streamline approval process for upgrading transmission facilities by allowing advanced reconductoring projects without construction permits, reducing costs and improving efficiency
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Application of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U39E) for Review of the Disadvantaged Communities – Green Tariff, Community Solar Green Tariff and Green Tariff Shared Renewables Programs.
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Bill to cut California's industrial emissions, shift to zero-emission tech, and prioritize disadvantaged communities by 2045
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Streamline approval process for upgrading transmission facilities by allowing advanced reconductoring projects without construction permits, reducing costs and improving efficiency
Renewable Energy Programs Update
The recent documents related to A22-05-022 provide a comprehensive update on the state of renewable energy programs in California, focusing on the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) and community solar projects. Here's a breakdown of the key points and positions from various stakeholders:
Overview of Renewable Energy Programs
- The NVBT and community solar projects are at the forefront, with discussions on their potential to expand renewable energy access.
- Criticisms target the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) for not fully recognizing the benefits of NVBT and potentially undermining renewable energy efforts.
Comments on Proposed Decision
- The Coalition for Community Solar Access expresses concerns about the proposed decision not aligning with Assembly Bill 2316 and the potential cost shifts to nonparticipating customers.
- Solar Landscape Origination LLC criticizes Pacific Gas and Electric Company's green tariff programs, suggesting modifications to better serve low-income households and increase the capacity of the Disadvantaged Communities Green Tariff Program (DAC-GT).
FERC Orders and Cases
Discussions include FERC orders related to electric storage and distributed energy resources, emphasizing that community solar facilities and utilities do not engage in wholesale sales.
Treatment of Credits
The treatment of credits from net metering and community solar is debated, with a focus on retail rate design under state jurisdiction.
Solar for All Program and National Community Solar Partnership
The document highlights the importance of targeting low-income households and recommends utilizing various funding sources for renewable energy projects.
Potential Modifications to the NVBT
Suggestions include implementing a net surplus compensation framework and applying it to all surplus energy at the end of the NVBT facility’s Relevant Period.
Recommendations for the NVBT Program
The NVBT program is praised for its flexibility and contribution to peak load reductions, with a call for the Commission to confirm NVBT resources as load modifiers.
Use of Funding Sources
Recommendations include utilizing state and federal funding sources like AB 102 and the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for renewable energy projects.
Targeting Low-Income Households
Emphasizes the importance of automatic enrollment and flat monetary credits on bills for existing program participants.
Challenges with PURPA Prices
Discusses the challenges with PURPA prices in attracting developers to community solar projects and suggests using additional funds to incentivize participation.
Stakeholder Comments
- Valta Energy and The Clean Coalition support the NVBT for its potential to democratize access to solar energy and promote equitable distribution of economic benefits.
- Concerns are raised about the commercial viability of the Community Renewable Energy Program (CREP) and the adequacy of compensation under PURPA’s framework.
Concusion
The documents collectively underscore the potential savings and advantages of deploying NVBT for renewable energy programs in California. Stakeholders urge the Commission to modify or reject the Proposed Decision based on these findings, highlighting the need for a program that benefits all ratepayers, promotes energy efficiency, and ensures participation from low-income households.
Order Instituting Rulemaking to Establish a Framework and Processes for Assessing the Affordability of Utility Service.
Last Week's New Proposed Decision +1
Proposed Decision
Commission Decision Overview
The Commission’s decision revises the affordability framework for essential utility services, effective immediately, and closes Rulemaking 18-07-006.
Utilities Affected
Investor-owned energy and Class A water utilities, including Pacific Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison, are now required to provide updated affordability metrics.
Updated Affordability Metrics
These metrics must be included only in...
General Rate Case Phase 1 applications where proposed revenue increases exceed one percent of authorized revenues. The required metrics include:
- Updated affordability ratios
- Changes in affordability metrics
- A quantitative summary of impacts on disadvantaged customers
- Historical and projected rate growth compared to inflation
For water utilities, similar requirements apply by ratemaking area.
Reporting and Accessibility
The annual Affordability Report will be posted on the Commission’s website to improve accessibility. Cost and Rate Trackers will continue to be released publicly, while Quarterly Revenue Reports are discontinued.
Broadband Service Level
The essential broadband service level is increased to 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload speeds, aligning with federal standards. The Commission will also prepare a report on affordability in the communications sector.
Confidential Data Treatment
The order grants confidential treatment for certain data from San Diego Gas & Electric but denies it for Southern California Edison.
Public Engagement and Recommendations
The decision summarizes public hearings, party comments, and progress on affordability proposals, and recommends further steps to address affordability challenges for California ratepayers.
Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Distributed Energy Resource Program Cost-Effectiveness Issues, Data Access and Use, and Equipment Performance Standards.
Last Week's New Comments +3
Overview
Recent reply comments in CPUC proceeding R22-11-013 address the Proposed Decision (PD) on the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC) process and related budget updates. This update summarizes a sampling of parties' positions on key topics, including process alignment, transparency, stakeholder engagement, cost-effectiveness testing, and budget considerations.
Alignment of ACC with Planning Processes
- CUE supports aligning the ACC update process with the...
- Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process, recommending that updates follow the adoption of the IRP preferred system plan or the Transmission Planning Process base case portfolio to ensure cost-effective demand-side investments.
- CUE urges the Commission to require the Energy Division to provide model test run results alongside ACC update proposals, citing the need for transparency and to avoid unproductive litigation over conceptual changes.
- SEIA emphasizes the importance of transparency in the ACC update process and sufficient time for stakeholder engagement, supporting calls for clarifications and additional processes to enhance the Integrated Calculation.
- CUE agrees with other parties that the reply comment period for ACC updates should be extended, recommending at least two weeks for meaningful review and engagement.
- CUE calls for clarification that the modified biennial update schedule for the ACC is ongoing and not limited to 2026, suggesting the PD should specify future update years to avoid confusion.
- SEIA supports clarifications and enhancements to the Integrated Calculation, advocating for inclusion of all resources expected to provide marginal GHG and capacity value, as previously determined by the Commission.
- SEIA concurs with CLECA that the PD should explicitly mandate an update to the Integrated Calculation in the 2026 ACC update process.
- SEIA supports the PD’s proposal to increase the ACC update budget from $350,000 to $1.2 million annually, stating that the expanded budget will facilitate necessary modeling and stakeholder feedback.
- SEIA supports the recommendation for a workshop prior to the release of the Staff ACC Update proposal, as suggested by SCE and CLECA, proposing that it occur in January 2026 to allow for informal comments on anticipated methodological changes.
- SoCalGas argues that proposed changes to ACC cost-effectiveness tests are outside the scope of the current PD and should be addressed in the 2026 ACC update proceeding, cautioning against expanding the scope at this stage.
- SoCalGas notes that the CPUC has reaffirmed the TRC test as the primary cost-effectiveness measure for demand-side resource programs, countering SCE’s claims about the TRC’s relevance to rates and asserting that the TRC appropriately considers both utility and participant costs, which is essential for maintaining energy bill affordability.
Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Implementation and Administration, and Consider Further Development, of California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program.
Last Week's New Proposed Decision +1
Proposed Decision
Decision Overview
The decision, effective immediately, adopts modified Draft 2025 Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) Procurement Plans from a variety of retail sellers. This includes major Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs) such as PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E, as well as Small and Multi-Jurisdictional Utilities (SMJUs), Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs), and Electric Service Providers (ESPs).
Finalization and Modifications
These plans are...
considered final unless corrections are required. There is a 30-day deadline for submitting clean and redlined versions if modifications are needed.
Procurement Approvals
The order approves long-term RPS resource procurement for IOUs and authorizes short-term transactions. However, requests for streamlined approval processes are denied, necessitating continued oversight through Tier 3 Advice Letters for long-term transactions and Tier 1 for short-term transactions.
Procurement and Compliance Strategies
PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E are permitted to procure and renegotiate RPS contracts, manage renewable energy credits (RECs), and pursue compliance strategies, including retiring RECs for Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credits.
Plans from Other Entities
- Other entities, such as Liberty Utilities, PacifiCorp, and Bear Valley Electric Service, have their plans accepted with required modifications.
- Several CCAs and ESPs must address deficiencies and provide additional analyses.
Confidentiality and Rulings
Motions for confidentiality and to file updated plans under seal are granted, and all previous rulings are affirmed.
Flexibility and Future Compliance
The decision emphasizes flexibility in procurement to meet RPS requirements and adapt to market changes. Findings indicate that most retail sellers are on track to meet the 65% long-term contract procurement requirement, though some may need additional resources to comply with future obligations. The proceeding remains open for further review and oversight.
Order Instituting Rulemaking to Modernize the Electric Grid for a High Distributed Energy Resources Future.
Last Week's New Ruling +1
Ruling Overview
This ruling addresses the response timeline for the Utility Consumers’ Action Network (UCAN) regarding their request from November 12, 2025. It also corrects a typographical error in the November 3, 2025 Assigned Commissioner’s Ruling (ACR).
Response Deadlines
- Responses to UCAN's request are due by 4:30 PM PST on November 14, 2025.
- The ACR requested information from the following Large Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs):
- Pacific Gas and...
- Electric
- Southern California Edison
- San Diego Gas and Electric
- Deadlines for these utilities to respond to two sets of questions are November 25 and December 10, 2025.
No Activity
Take the first step to simplify Policy tracking
Ready to dive in?

